Anti Terrorism Bill Signed into Law

After the failed coup in 2016, Turkish authorities used the bills to arrest journalists and critics en masse. In 2016, Turkey arrested 136 journalists, 135 of whom were accused of terrorism. And 2019 was the first year since 2016 that Turkey was not the worst prison guard for journalists in the world, but only because it shut down more than a hundred media outlets to separate them from the platform. Many human rights activists were arrested in 2017, 2018 and 2019. After a court acquitted a civil rights protester of terrorism charges last February, he was arrested again hours later. According to the Turkish government in July 2019, nearly 70,000 people in Turkey have been tried for terrorism and more than 150,000 have been investigated for terrorism – including 119 journalists and many of them activists. The National Federation of Women Farmers (Amihan) said the increase in red marking cases in the country confirmed the prevailing criticisms of the controversial legislation. [87] The Association of Major Religious Superiors of the Philippines (AMRSP), which brings together the heads of the country`s religious orders of men and women, expressed opposition to the law, which they said could “violate human dignity and human rights.” [88] Various Filipino artists have also expressed disappointment and disagreement with the signing of the law. [89] [90] Members of the Philippine art scene have also expressed dissent. [91] But Dr.

Rommel C. Banlaoi, president of the Philippine Institute for Peace, Violence and Terrorism,[92] defends the need for a new Philippine counterterrorism law, as terrorist threats in the Philippines have intensified even during the COVID-19 pandemic. [93] Nevertheless, Mr. Banlaoi is encouraged by those who oppose the Anti-terrorism Act to continue what they are doing to remain vigilant and ensure the protection of human rights during the implementation of this Act. [Citation needed] Responding to the news that Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte has signed the anti-terrorism law, Nicholas Bequelin, Amnesty International`s Asia-Pacific Regional Director, said: “This government has indeed developed a new weapon to mark and hunt down all the supposed enemies of the state. In the prevailing climate of impunity, such a vague law on the definition of “terrorism” can only exacerbate attacks on human rights defenders. An Ethiopian anti-terrorism law passed in 2009 mirrors Manila`s legislation: it criminalizes acts (such as writing, publishing, publishing or disseminating statements) that directly or indirectly “promote” terrorism and gives the police the power to detain suspects for forty-eight hours without a warrant. For years, this law has been used to imprison peaceful political activists, opposition members and journalists. Since the summer of 2011, at least thirty-three dissidents have been charged with terrorism.

In Kafkaesque fashion, a well-known journalist was arrested as a terrorist for publishing an article criticizing the Ethiopian government`s application of the law to imprison journalists. He was sentenced to eighteen years in prison and his newspaper had to close. Nine judges said it was unconstitutional for the Counter-Terrorism Council to designate individuals and groups as terrorists on the basis of requests from other countries or international organizations such as ASEAN or the EU. The applicants described him as a flagrant violation of due process because he deprived an accused of the opportunity to be heard in the Philippines before being classified as a terrorist. In the Philippines, politically motivated arrests were unfortunately common even before the new law was passed. Duterte`s two biggest critics in the Senate have been behind bars for more than a year. Police arrested people protesting against the anti-terrorism law, while pro-government protesters were allowed to gather. If Duterte`s record is any indication, the effects of the anti-terrorism law will be a deterrent. “The passage of this law gives the government excessive and unchecked powers. “Counter-terrorism” legislation must ensure respect for international human rights and international humanitarian law and protect fundamental freedoms. 7.

Removal of damages awarded to those acquitted of terrorism charges The House of Representatives voted by 173 votes to 31 in favor of the bill with 29 abstentions, but was corrected to 168-36 a day later to reflect corrections and withdrawals of members. Members voted in plenary and via Zoom and recorded the viber community in their “All Members”[48] Ms. Bachelet cited “a reluctance on the part of the state to hold perpetrators of extrajudicial executions to account” and urged Mr. Duterte not to sign the anti-terrorism law, which she said blurs the differences between criticism of the government and what terrorism is. UP Diliman also knelt in solidarity with Black Lives Matter and the fight against police brutality[95] after the murder of George Floyd by the police officer while he was arrested for allegedly using a fake bill in Minneapolis, Minnesota. [96] MANILA – President Rodrigo Duterte on Friday signed a controversial anti-terrorism law aimed at combating Islamic militancy in the south, a move that critics say could lead to more widespread human rights violations. Duterte spokesman Harry Roque said the new law was needed to crack down on terrorism. “Terrorism, as we have often said, strikes anytime and anywhere,” Roque said.

“This is a crime against people and humanity.

Unifisio - Fisioterapia Hospitalar